Marchant v. Langworthy
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
On error from the supreme court, to review a judgment of that court affirming a judgment of the common pleas of Monroe county. The facts in the case and the opinion of the court below may be seen in the report in 6 Hill, 646. The action was trover, and the defendants justified as school district officers under a warrant for the collection of a school tax.
Read the full summary
On error from the supreme court, to review a judgment of that court affirming a judgment of the common pleas of Monroe county. The facts in the case and the opinion of the court below may be seen in the report in 6 Hill, 646. The action was trover, and the defendants justified as school district officers under a warrant for the collection of a school tax. The defendants were chosen at an annual district meeting, held on the first Monday of October, 1842. That meeting was held pursuant to an adjournment voted at the annual district meeting held the preceding year, but no notice was given of…
1Opinion of the Court
*527No written opinions were given, but upon the question being put, eighteen members of the court voted in favor of affirmance, and two for reversal; whereupon the judgment of the supreme court was affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Mears & Lewis v. DexterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
- Dawson v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Looney v. HughesNew York Supreme Court · 1858
- Cunningham v. CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Stevenson v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.