Legal Opinion · Dissent

Armstrong v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 9, 1994No. CA CR 93-125Published

1DissentJames R. Cooper, Judge

I dissent because I believe that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the appellant’s convictions of burglary and arson. I submit that there is sufficient evidence from the record for the jury to find that the Hall residence partially burned on December 17, 1991; that the fire started as a result of arson, with ethyl-alcohol used as the accel-erant; that the appellant had been heard to threaten to burn the Hall house; that the appellant had offered to burn his landlord’s trailer a year or two earlier, said that he could do it without a trace using alcohol, and told the landlord that he…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Norton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Selph v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. Holloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API