Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Unity Life & Accident Insurance Ass'n

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided July 20, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMargaret Mary J. Mangan, J.

Motion by plaintiff for summary judgment. The interpleaded defendant does not dispute the identity of the plaintiff being the designated beneficiary named “ Mary Hunt, Wife ” on the policy of life insurance issued by the defendant association. His contention is that she is not and never was the wife of his decedent brother, the insured and that she had no insurable interest. The term “wife” is merely descriptive and does not affect her right to receive the insurance benefits of the policy. (Gibson v. Travelers Ins. Co., 183 Misc. 678.) The documentary proof shows the application for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Bernucci v. Marfre Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Corder v. Prudential InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Columbian Mutual Life Insurance v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Nicholson v. Hartford Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API