Legal Opinion

State v. Lowenhaught

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1883PublishedCited by 2 opinions

PROM TIPTON. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Tipton eounty. T. J. Flippin, J.

1Opinion of the CourtFreeman, J.

The defendant was presented for selling liquor by the quart, and in larger quantites, not to be drank on the premises, not having any special license so to do, in violation as is avowed, of the act of the Legislature, requiring wholesale liquor dealers to take out a license. The presentment was quashed by the circuit judge, and the State appealed.

The only question is, whether the act as charged,, is the subject of a criminal prosecution.

By the general revenue act of 1881, page 256, sec. 40, it is declared to be a privilege, among other things, to follow the occupation of a “liquor dealer,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Department of Treasury v. RidgelyIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Esso Standard Oil Co. v. CobbTennessee Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API