Legal Opinion

People v. Hajdasz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1994No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record establishes that defendant’s guilty plea was knowing, voluntary and intelligent (see, People v Jefferson, 203 AD2d 908). Furthermore, defendant was afforded a reasonable opportunity to present the grounds for his challenge to the plea and his request for an adjournment and neither further inquiry nor an evidentiary hearing was required (see, People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520, 525; People v McNair [appeal No. 1], 186 AD2d 1089, lv denied 80 NY2d 1028). (Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Burke, J.—Burglary, 3rd Degree.)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. FrederickNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. McNairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. People v. JeffersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. HajdaszAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API