Legal Opinion

Andrew M. Isaacs v. The Honorable Christopher B. Wigand, et al.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided July 31, 2026No. 0:25-cv-62375Unknown

1Opinion

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 25-62375-CIV-SINGHAL ANDREW M. ISAACS, Plaintiff, vs. THE HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER B. WIGAND, et al., Defendants. ______________________________________/ ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on a sua sponte review of Plaintiff’s Complaint. (DE [1]). Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, see (DE [16]), his Complaint must be screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Under § 1915(e)(2)(B), the court must dismiss any action brought in forma pauperis if the court determines the action is frivolous, fails to state a claim on which relief can be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Bilal v. DriverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Rebekka Anne Behr v. James CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API