Legal Opinion

State v. DORCY

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 9, 2010No. A09-1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

Respondent Robert John Dorcy, Jr. has filed a motion to dismiss this prosecution pretrial appeal because the appellant State of Minnesota failed to timely serve its notice of appeal on the state public defenders office (SPDO), as required by Minn. R.Crim. P. 28.02, subd. 2(2), (8). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

FACTS

The district court filed an order on October 13, 2009, suppressing testimony from the state’s sole witness for Brady violations and dismissing the two gross misdemeanor driving while impaired (DWI) charges against respondent.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. City of Albert Lea v. HarrerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Wise v. BixCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API