State v. DORCY
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
Respondent Robert John Dorcy, Jr. has filed a motion to dismiss this prosecution pretrial appeal because the appellant State of Minnesota failed to timely serve its notice of appeal on the state public defenders office (SPDO), as required by Minn. R.Crim. P. 28.02, subd. 2(2), (8). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.
FACTS
The district court filed an order on October 13, 2009, suppressing testimony from the state’s sole witness for Brady violations and dismissing the two gross misdemeanor driving while impaired (DWI) charges against respondent.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- City of Albert Lea v. HarrerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Wise v. BixCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013