Legal Opinion

McCarty v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 15, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Mahaska District Court. — Hon. John F. Tal-bott, Judge. Action to partition certain real estate, and for the sale thereof because it could not be partitioned in kind. The trial court established the interests of the various parties, and some of the defendants undertook an appeal. Appeal

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

On account of the numerous abstracts and amendments thereto, and several certifications of the record, the case is in considerable confusion, and we may have some Appeal : nunc pro tunc orders : when conclusive. difficulty in stating it. After the original decree was passed, and after an appeal was taken to this court, certain pleadings were filed, and at least two nunc pro tunc orders were entered by the district court correcting some of the records. One of these orders related to the time of the filing of an affidavit for the publication of notice, and another to the time of the actual…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Diver v. Keokuk Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Henry, Lee & Co. v. Cass County Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. First National Bank v. Gill & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  4. Will of Downs v. BurgessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Capital Food Co. v. Globe Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fairchild v. PlankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  2. Oskaloosa Savings Bank v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  3. Taylor v. Woodburn BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. In Re Estate of ShumakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  5. Jenkins v. BeelerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API