Waller v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Judge.
The accused was tried and convicted on an indictment charging the offense of rape.
The defendant did not request the affirmative charge; neither did 'he file a motion for a new trial. In this state of the record the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment of conviction is not presented for our review. Woodson v. State, 170 Ala. 87, 54 So. 191; Williams v. State, 31 Ala.App. 48, 11 So.2d 870.
After the appellant had brought out portions of certain conversations, the State was permitted to inquire into other parts of the same conversations. This was not against the rule.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Woodson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Lovejoy v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
- Brannon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
- Wesson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Herndon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Patton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
- Winstead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.