Legal Opinion
O'Brien v. Root
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 22, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
This is the second appeal in this case. See 164 Ark. 156. The facts are correctly stated in appellants ’ brief as follows:
“On November 7, 1923, after having given proper notice, some of the appellees filed a petition in the county court, praying that Cypert Township be exempted from the provisions of act No. 239, as provided by § 11 of said act. The .appellants made themselves parties to the proceedings by filing a remonstrance, denying, among other things, that the petition for exemption, contained a majority of the qualified electors of the township. A hearing was had on November 12, 1923,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McClure v. TopfSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Bordwell v. DillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
- McCullough v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
- Colvin v. FinchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Root v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mahan v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Reed v. Paving Dist. 2 of Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Solomon v. CarrollSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927