Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Root

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 22, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

This is the second appeal in this case. See 164 Ark. 156. The facts are correctly stated in appellants ’ brief as follows:

“On November 7, 1923, after having given proper notice, some of the appellees filed a petition in the county court, praying that Cypert Township be exempted from the provisions of act No. 239, as provided by § 11 of said act. The .appellants made themselves parties to the proceedings by filing a remonstrance, denying, among other things, that the petition for exemption, contained a majority of the qualified electors of the township. A hearing was had on November 12, 1923,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McClure v. TopfSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  2. Bordwell v. DillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
  3. McCullough v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
  4. Colvin v. FinchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  5. Root v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mahan v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  2. Reed v. Paving Dist. 2 of Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. Solomon v. CarrollSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API