Oak Grove Water Co. v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeals, Nos. 192 and 193, Jan. T., 1911, by plaintiff from orders of C. P. Schuylkill Co., Nov. T., 1909, Nos. 320 and 321, refusing to affirm bonds in case of Oak Grove Water Company v. Albert Thompson. Exceptions to bonds. Before Brumm, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Errors assigned, were the orders refusing to affirm the bonds.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Brown,
These two appeals, to be regarded as writs of certiorari, bring up records in each of which the appellant contends error is disclosed in the refusal of the court below to approve its bond to secure to the appellee pay*488ment of damages for taking his lands for its alleged corporate purposes under its alleged right of eminent domain. The two records are exactly similar, and, as each appeal raises the same question, what is about to be said applies to both. Very much that does not appear on the records has crept into the paper books of both the appellant and appellee,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Seligsohn AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Miller Estate v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Falls Township Authority v. Levitt & Sons, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1952
- Penndel Petition, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1961