Legal Opinion
Azalea Drive-In Theatre, Incorporated v. Sargoy
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided February 25, 1975No. Civ. A. 73-347-NPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
KELLAM, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff corporations, which own and operate outdoor motion picture theatres in the Tidewater area of Virginia, instituted this action pursuant to Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15, and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331(a), 1332 and 1337, 1 alleging that the defendants, motion picture distributing corporations and their agents, had violated the federal antitrust laws by combining or conspiring to restrain interstate trade or commerce, 2 by monopolizing or attempting to monopolize such trade or commerce, 3 and by fixing prices. 4
The case was tried to the jury…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Miami v. KoryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Nodak Oil Co., a North Dakota Corporation v. Mobil Oil Corp., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Freedlander, Inc. v. NCNB National Bank of North CarolinaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1991
- Moore v. Allied Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.