Legal Opinion
United States v. Pedro Angulo-Lopez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 6, 1997No. 96-30143Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
105 F.3d 667
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Pedro ANGULO-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-30143.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 11, 1996.*
Decided Jan. 6, 1997.
Before: JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., THOMPSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM**
2
Pedro Angulo-Lopez pleaded guilty to illegal reentry…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Jose Garza CantuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Hiroyasu Takai Akiko MagnesonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry Erwin EYLER, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.