Legal Opinion

State v. Motarie

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 2004No. 04-153PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Gary Motarie appeals the District Court’s denial of his motion for a directed verdict. Motarie argues that the State failed to prove an element necessary for finding him guilty of intimidation and tampering with witnesses. Sections 45-7-206 and 45-5-203, MCA (2001). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶2 Phil Iverson reported Motarie to the Turn in Poachers, or T.I.P. program, for allegedly poaching an elk on the Sun River Game Range-where hunting elk is illegal. The Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks established the T.I.P. program to give recreationists an easy way to report violations of fish,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. LongstrethMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. HawkMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. DahlinMontana Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. G. SpottedbearMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Alexander v. Bozeman Motors, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. T. DellarMontana Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Alexander v. Bozeman Motors, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. R. StrobelMontana Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API