Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shine v. Duncan Petroleum Transport, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1983Published

1DissentJasen, J.

The court holds today, almost casually, that both courts below had abused their discretion, as a matter of law, in staying further proceedings in this action pending a determination by the Workers’ Compensation Board as to whether plaintiffs’ decedents were employees of defendant Duncan Petroleum Transport, Inc., at the time they suffered injuries resulting in theindeaths. Because I cannot agree that the courts below abused their discretion, especially in light of our clear pronouncements in Murray v City of New York (43 NY2d 400) and O’Rourke v Long (41 NY2d 219), I must dissent.

In O’Rourke…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murray v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Claim of Gordon v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Murray v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API