Legal Opinion

Erath v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 28, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, P. J.

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the Supreme Court entered upon a decision dismissing the complaint in an action to recover upon a life insurance policy, submitted upon an agreed statement of facts. An application for insurance upon the life of plaintiff’s daughter, then five and one-half years old, was executed by her father who, at the same time, paid $62.60, representing the first premium, and obtained the defendant company’s receipt therefor. The application provided that “if the full first premium * * * is paid * * * and if the completed application and such other information as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hart v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Hart v. Travelers Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Corning v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Corning v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campaign v. Dime Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. May v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API