Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 6, 1967Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McNally, J. (concurring and dissenting in part).

I concur in the modification increasing the alimony to $96,000 annually, but would provide that the alimony be retroactive to October 19, 1961. There is no logic, in my opinion, for the deprivation of support for the four-year and two-month period from the date of appellant’s abandonment of respondent on October 19, 1961, to January 28, 1966, the date the ease was restored to the calendar for the determination of the amount of support. There is ample support in the cases for the award of retroactive support. (Harris v. Harris, 259 N. Y. 334,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Forrest v. . ForrestNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. McCarthy v. . McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Harris v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Horter v. HorterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API