Legal Opinion

Harrod Construction Corp. v. Englander

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenman, J.

In determining this motion to dismiss the complaint the evidence presented on behalf of the plaintiff must be considered to be true. The plaintiff was about to sign a contract to do some construction work for Milton Engineering Corporation. It insisted upon having a guaranty that it would receive the payments to be made under the proposed contract; and was referred for that purpose to the defendant. No pecuniary connection of any kind has been established between the defendant and Milton Engineering Corporation. The defendant made certain glowing representations to the plaintiff as to his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Levy v. Industrial Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. In Re the Examination of DunfeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. In re AldridgeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1909
  4. Otto Gerdau Co. v. RadwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Car Rental System, Inc. v. Rippey (In Re Rippey)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1982
  2. Beneficial Finance Co. v. CasadonteMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API