Hoosier Engineering Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentDoyle, Judge
I respectfully dissent.
Under Section 301(c)(2) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act),1 the employer liable for the payment of benefits is “that employer giving the longest period of *237employment in which the employe was exposed to the hazards of the disease claimed.”
I believe the proper reading of this language of the Act requires that liability be imposed on the employer providing the “longest period or term of employment,” a quantitive standard, and not, as the majority interprets the language, the employer who provided the longest period of exposure, a qualitative measurement.
S…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Industrial Services Contracting, Inc. v. WilsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Marcucci v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Jones & Langhlin Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Adams Steel Erection, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.