Legal Opinion

Foureman v. Foureman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1946No. 647PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal on questions of law from the judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Darke county, Ohio, wherein the court construed the will of Lazarus Foureman, deceased, and issued a decree for the partition of certain lands known as the "home farm." Under the will, the widow, Elizabeth B. Foureman, was given a life estate with a remainder to the children share and share alike. The will further provided in item 5 that "should any child or children become dissatisfied with this my will and cause any trouble in the settlement of my said estate, or go into court for the purpose of contesting…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Minor v. ShippleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Persinger v. BrittonOhio Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Baker v. AlexanderOhio Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Siltstone Resources, L.L.C. v. Ohio Pub. Works Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Durbin v. DurbinOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Neidler v. DonaldsonSeneca County Probate Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API