Usher v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of larceny; from city court of Madison — Judge Lambert. September 17, 1921.
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. Although evidence when admitted may be objectionable as hearsay, not coming strictly within the res gestae, the irregularity in admitting it is not such as to require a new trial, if the direct facts be proved by another witness whose knowledge of them is personal and immediate, and as whose sayings they were detailed by the other witness. Lovett v. State, 60 Ga. 258 (4); Smith v. State, 24 Ga. App. 654 (101 S. E. 764); Cochran v. Meeks, 25 Ga. App. 61 (2) (102 S. E. 550). Under the above ruling, the alleged error complained of in the amendment to the motion for a new trial does not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Cochran v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Beasley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lunsford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Hutto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Glisson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Parish v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968