Commonwealth v. Hunt
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HESTER, Judge:
Appeal is taken from the judgment of sentence imposed following appellant’s conviction of two counts of aggravated assault, criminal conspiracy, and possession of instruments of crime. The sole issue in this appeal is whether the statement taken from appellant prior to trial was obtained in a voluntary manner. We hold that it was and will therefore affirm.
On the evening of September 13, 1976 at approximately 7:30 p. m., complainants Fryson and Mitchell were at their home at 4210 Wyalusing Avenue in Philadelphia. Appellant, accompanied by an unidentified man, rang the doorbell…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StammSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. WebbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. WhitnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.