Legal Opinion

Chattanooga Electric Ry. Co. v. Cooper

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1902PublishedCited by 18 opinions

FROM HAMILTÓN. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Hamilton County. Floyd Estill, Judge. '

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Beard

The evidence in this case tended to prove that the intestate of the defendant in error, a very old man, in crossing one of the streets of Chattanooga, over which the plaintiff in error operated its cars by electric power, suddenly found himself in a position of apparent peril from a rapidly approaching automobile, and in attempting to escape, in a moment of alarm and excitement, inadvertently ran upon one of the tracks of the plaintiff in error, and was killed by one of its passing cars. This car was moving in a direction opposite to that of the automobile, and the evidence also tended to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marble Co. v. BlackTennessee Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Power Packing Co. v. BorumCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  3. Hines v. SweeneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Ruth v. RuthTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Bryant v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API