Legal Opinion

Folsom v. Prospect Hill Resources, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 11, 1988No. 87-8324PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Charles Folsom, Jr. appealed to the district court from the bankruptcy court's partial disallowance of his claim against the bankrupt estate. The district court reversed the bankruptcy court and held that because Folsom was not an employee at the time the debtor breached its contract with him, 11 U.S.C.A. § 502(b)(7) (West Supp.1987) does not apply to his claim. Accordingly, the district court held, his claim should have been allowed. We affirm.

The facts are not in dispute. The debt- or’s predecessor, Prospect Hill Resources, entered into an employment agreement with Folsom on July 14, 1970.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Matter of Gee & Missler Services, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 18 Collier bankr.cas.2d 324, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,196 in Re Prospect Hill Resources, Inc., D/B/A Bass & Company, Debtor. Charles Folsom, Jr. v. Prospect Hill Resources, Inc., D/B/A Bass & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API