Legal Opinion

Sangel v. Astrue

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided May 23, 2011No. C10-4070-PAZPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL A. ZOSS, United States Chief Magistrate Judge.

Introduction

This matter is before the court for judicial review of a decision by an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) denying the plaintiffs application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. The plaintiff Sara M. Sangel claims substantial evidence on the record as a whole fails to support the ALJ’s decision that she is not disabled.

Sangel filed her application on November 21, 2005, alleging a disability onset date of March 15, 2001. 1 Her claim was…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. Dennis W. Pearsall v. Larry Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  5. Geneva Goff v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rahe v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2011
  2. Chiasson v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2023
  3. Claude R. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API