Legal Opinion

Brewer v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1929No. 8 Div. 757PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRige, J.

From the opinion in the case of Shields v. State, 104 Ala. 35, 39, 40, 16 So. 85, 87 (53 Am. St. Rep. 17), we quote the following: “Evidence is not infrequently obtained by methods which are reprehensible in good morals, offensive to fair dealing, subjecting it to unfavorable inferences, the party relying upon it must neutralize, to entitle it to full credence. And evidence is sometimes obtained under circumstances which meet with the unqualified disapprobation of the Courts. The evidence, however unfairly and illegally obtained, is not subject to exclusion, if it be of facts in themselves…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shields v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Banks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Ex Parte BanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Mullins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  3. Dodd v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Brewer v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Wallace v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API