Legal Opinion

Crouse v. Creanza

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided May 1, 1987No. 87-C-76-SPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SHABAZ, District Judge.

Before the Court is the motion of the defendants to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or alternatively for failure to state a claim. 1 Plaintiff seeks a declaration that California state courts, and not Wisconsin state courts, have jurisdiction to decide the custody of his daughter and that defendants seek no further orders from Wisconsin courts regarding paternity or custody of the child. Plaintiff asserts that jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1738A.

FACTS

For purposes of this motion the Court assumes the following facts:

Plaintiff Carl…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Interest of AEHWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Edwards v. GronerDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1987
  3. P.C. v. C.C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Evans v. EvansDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API