Legal Opinion

Cardwell v. Uhl

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 5, 1919No. 22,122PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 1; Robert D. Garvér, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

M. W. Cardwell recovered a judgment against Brigham Uhl on account of his failure to perform two contracts for the delivery of wheat. The defendant appeals.

1. One of the contracts, entered into on October 16, 1916, called for the delivery within sixty days, or by December 15. The action was begun on December 13, 1916. The defendant asserts that it was prematurely brought. There was evidence, which the jury must be deemed to have accepted, that the defendant, on November 30, explicitly declared that he would not carry out either of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cooper v. BowerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Kansas Flour Mills Co. v. BrandtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Draper v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Trusler Grain Co. v. Earlton Grange Coöperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Strong v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Benton Grain Co. v. RegerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Clark v. Topeka Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API