Legal Opinion

City of Melbourne v. Gervais

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 1, 2005No. 5D04-1987Published

1Opinion of the Court

'' PLEUS, J.

The orders finding no probable cause for seizure of the appellee/claimant’s property (electronic video machines, gift cards and $17,354.50 in currency) and directing return' of said property to her are reversed based upon the following holdings:

First, the City carried its burden at the hearing below of showing probable cause to bélieve that the subject property constituted illegal gambling devices and paraphernalia as per sections 849.15, 849.16 and 932.701(2)(a)2, Florida Statutes;

Second, the “arcade” exception contained in section 849.161(l)(a)l, Florida Statutes, for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CyphersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Delorme v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API