Legal Opinion

Miranda v. Jewel Companies, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 27, 1989No. 2-89-0187PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

Plaintiff, Patricia J. Miranda, appeals the trial court’s order dismissing her complaint with prejudice, the trial court having found plaintiff’s fraud claim against her employer, defendant, Jewel Companies, Inc., preempted by Federal labor law. On appeal, plaintiff contends that the existing collective-bargaining agreement and the Federal labor statutes are not applicable to her fraud claim and need not be analyzed in order to resolve the claims alleged in her complaint. We affirm the dismissal for the reasons discussed below.

I. THE STANDARD OF REVIEW

The trial court granted defendant’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Kellerman v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Gonzalez v. Prestress Engineering Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Buchheit of Sparta, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Nikolic v. SeidenbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Santa Claus Industries, Inc. v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Reese v. Forsythe Mergers Group, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Daiwa Bank, Ltd. v. La Salle National Trust, N.A.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API