Commonwealth v. Ziegler
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*149CERCONE, Judge:
The instant appeal arises from the lower court’s granting of appellant’s demurrer to the charge of rape. The demurrer was granted because the Commonwealth had failed to establish that venue was obtained in Berks County. On appeal the Commonwealth rests its position almost exclusively on the proposition that appellant waived this objection by failing to raise it at the preliminary hearing. We disagree.
Principally, the Commonwealth contends that Pa.R. Crim.P., Rule 25 requires the accused to raise the question of venue at the preliminary hearing. Rule 25 provides:
“(a) Objections…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth v. CreamerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. SimeoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth ex rel. Paylor v. CavellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Commonwealth v. MangumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LawtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. DudenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. BertelsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Baumert v. Municipal Court of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Com. v. Kerrick, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.