State v. Browder
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Gregory, Justice:
Appellant Hurst was convicted o£ violating Section 16-15-390 of the South Carolina Code (1976) (Cum. Supp. 1980) by placing or failing to remove sexually oriented materials on public display; he was also convicted of violating Section 16-15-310 of the South Carolina Code (1976) (Cum. Supp. 1980) by disseminating obscene motion pictures. Hurst received six-month concurrent sentences for the two violations.
Appellant Browder was convicted of violating both code sections on two separate occasions. He received a one-year term and a concurrent one-year term for the violations of §…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. TannerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989