Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Tarnowski

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 29, 1941PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The question here is whether Chancery is invested with jurisdiction to restrain the enforcement of a judgment at law “for equitable fraud” under these circumstances: Tarnowski, the defendant herein, sued the complainant insurer at law on a policy of insurance issued upon the life of his deceased mother, payable to him as beneficiary. The insurer answered setting up “fraudulent” misrepresentations, suppression and concealment by the insured of certain facts material to the risk respecting illnesses and the nature thereof, attendance by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilcox v. Iowa Wesleyan UniversitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1871

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. ManzoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  2. Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  3. Ledley v. William Penn Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, a Corporation of the State of Maryland v. Hudson United Bank, a Banking Corporation of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API