Legal Opinion

Wright v. Smith

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1872PublishedCited by 4 opinions

This cause was heard by the Vice-Chancellor, upon the pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor.

The bill in this cause prays relief against a mortgage, on the ground that it was fraudulently procured. The complainant, Benjamin H. Wright, is a resident of Rome, in the state of Yew York, and the defendant, James Smith, of Yew-ton, in this state. Wright, being the owner of a certain interest in some mineral lands in the county of Sussex, and desirous of purchasing the fee of the lands, (the same being about forty acres belonging to one Ackerson,) and wishing also to buy an adjoining tract called the Howell farm, made known his wishes in 1869 to the defendant, who was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rankin v. PorterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rice v. First Nat. Bank in AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Shoup v. DowseyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  3. Tiernan v. Carasaljo PinesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Mianulli v. GunaganNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API