Legal Opinion

Teron v. Sheridan

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided October 15, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and also from an order denying a motion for a new trial. Action for services.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCarthy, J.

It is conceded by both counsel that the plaintiff is only entitled to services actually performed for and agreed to be paid by the defendant. It is also conceded that all the other matters involved have been stricken out by consent.

The issue is therefore plain and simple. What period of time has the plaintiff proven, under the rules of evidence, he is entitled to ? It is plain that defendant is only liable to plaintiff for work done by him for her under her telegram to Mr. Allen or under his authority as agent. It seems to us, therefore, that the plaintiff, not having any but his own…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Steele v. LippmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API