Legal Opinion

Adams v. Ingalls Packing Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1948No. 30453PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, C. J.

Respondent, Hayssen Manufacturing Company, is engaged in business at Shéboygan, Wisconsin. Ingalls Packing Company was engaged in business at Auburn, Washington.

A conditional sales contract for the purchase of a model 5-9 Hayssen wrapping machine was signed by the Ingalls Packing Company, hereinafter called the vendee, on April 23, 1946. It was accepted by the Hayssen Manufacturing Company, hereinafter called the respondent vendor, on May 21, 1946. The vendee took possession of the machine August 23, 1946, at Auburn, Washington. The respondent vendor had filed in the office of the auditor of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davies v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Bellion v. DurandUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hotel Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. In Re Wittkowsky's LandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. In re Wittkowsky's LandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chatlos v. OverstreetSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  2. Johnson v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  3. Phipps v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In re KellerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1954
  5. Dando v. West Wind Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API