Helton v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSykes, P. J.
The appellant was convicted of having liquor in his possession. From which conviction, this appeal is here prosecuted.
*624The testimony for the state is to the effect that the sheriff and other county officers found two kegs of liquor in some woods about one hundred yards from the home of the appellant. They had no search' warrant to search the lands of the appellant. There was testimony of the state indicating that the appellant was seen, by these officers near the kegs of whisky. That, after the officers took possession of the whisky, they went to the home of appellant, and he told them he knew…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Arnett v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Corry v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. GrundeisIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Barnard v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
- Feazell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.