Hoe v. . Sanborn
New York Court of Appeals
An order of the General Term affirming an order of the Special Term denying a motion to re-tax costs and to correct the judgment roll, is not the subject of ■ appeal to this Court. Nor is an order of the General Term dismissing, an appeal from an order of the Special Term refusing a mandamus, appealable. Nor is an order dismissing an appeal from an order of Special Term denying motion to correct case, appealable to this Court.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The Appellant in his notice of appeal states that he appeals from the judgment in the action, and from three several" orders of the Supreme Court, which he specifies. The Eespondent, at the last September Term of the Court, moved to dismiss the appeals from the orders, when the Court directed the motion and the appeal to be heard together.
The orders thus appealed from are:
First. An order affirming an order of the Special Term, denying a motion for a re taxation of costs, and to correct the judgment roll.
Second. An order dismissing an appeal from an order of Special Term, refusing a mandamus.
Th…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Milburn v. BelloniNew York Supreme Court · 1861
- Passenger v. ThorburnNew York Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by5 opinions
- Union Selling Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Gaetjens v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Hoe v. SanbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Rice v. ChildsNew York Supreme Court · 1882
- Scoville v. KentNew York Supreme Court · 1868