Legal Opinion

Magenau & Co. v. Bell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1883PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to modify judgment entered in the case reported in 13 Neb., 247.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

An opinion was filed in this case in September, 1882, which is reported in 13 Neb., 247. In that opinion it was held that a person who is precluded by statute from testifying against an executor, cannot by transferring his interest be rendered competent to testify, and we adhere to that decision. It was also held that a transfer by a plaintiff of his interest in the action to his co-plaintiff during the pendency of the suit, did not justify the court in dismissing the action. The judgment of the district court was thereupon reversed and the case remanded.

The plaintiff in error…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fullerton v. President of the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Magemau & Co. v. BellNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vorlicky v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Curtis v. PerryNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API