Pugh v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
On August 6, 1997, Cedric Roman Pugh pleaded guilty to first-degree robbery and was sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment. He did not file a direct appeal, but did file a Rule 32, Ala. R. Crim. P., petition for post-conviction relief. He now appeals from the trial court's dismissal of that petition.
I
Pugh argues that the trial court erred in summarily dismissing his Rule 32 petition without holding an evidentiary hearing and making specific findings of fact.
A
In his petition before the trial court, Pugh asserted that his trial counsel was ineffective because (1) counsel, he says, failed to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte BoatwrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Ex Parte DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Cobb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000