Legal Opinion

Pugh v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 2, 1998No. CR-97-1636PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On August 6, 1997, Cedric Roman Pugh pleaded guilty to first-degree robbery and was sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment. He did not file a direct appeal, but did file a Rule 32, Ala. R. Crim. P., petition for post-conviction relief. He now appeals from the trial court's dismissal of that petition.

I

Pugh argues that the trial court erred in summarily dismissing his Rule 32 petition without holding an evidentiary hearing and making specific findings of fact.

A

In his petition before the trial court, Pugh asserted that his trial counsel was ineffective because (1) counsel, he says, failed to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ex Parte BoatwrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Ex Parte DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  2. Cobb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API