Stetson v. Parks

This case comes from the Superior Court on an agreed statement of facts, with a petition for review of proceedings terminated by decision of the Law Court under date of July 19, 1935, 133 Me., 463, 180, A., 366. That opinion is so recent that it need not now be repeated.

By such decision this Court held that a new promise to pay, “whether made after the discharge (of defendant, in bankruptcy), or between the adjudication and the discharge, is within the Statute of Frauds.”

“In this state, there is no provision by statute or rule for a rehearing by the Law Court after a decision rendered.”

Booth…