Legal Opinion

Nearen v. Bakewell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court. — Hon. John L. Thomas, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Rombauer, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court. •

This is an action to rescind a sale of eighty acres of land, to reinvest the defendants with the title thereto, and to compel them to give up for cancellation ten promissory notes, part of the purchase money, and a deed of trust to secure the same, given by the plaintiffs to the defendants. The ground on which the contract is sought to be rescinded is fraud in the sale.

The first question which we are bound to determine is our own'jurisdiction of the appeal. That jurisdiction depends on the proposition as to whether the action is one…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HoustonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  2. Dunn v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  3. Isaacs v. SkrainkaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  4. Baier v. BerberichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. Dunn v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hanna v. South St. Joseph Land Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. HezelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  3. Bryant v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. Truesdail v. McCormickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Morris v. ClareSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API