Legal Opinion

Howard v. Chow

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1938No. Civ. 11809PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of defendants after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover a sum alleged to be due as a broker’s commission plaintiff appeals.

The essential facts are:

March 15,1937, defendants executed an instrument whereby they offered to exchange certain real property with the Mortgage Guarantee Company. This agreement contained a provision for the payment of a commission to plaintiff which read as follows:

“AND IT IS FURTHER AGREED with said H. A. Howard, that when he has secured an acceptance of the proposition to exchange the above described property on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cooper v. StansburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. American Aeronautics Corp. v. Grand Central Aircraft Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Bartone v. Taylor-Benson-Jones Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API