Legal Opinion
Cline v. Richards
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided August 19, 1977No. CIV-4-77-12PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
The plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint herein hereby is GRANTED. Rule 15(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Foman v. Davis (1962), 371 U.S. 178, 182, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9 L.Ed.2d 222, 226 (headnotes 5, 6, 7); Hayden v. Ford Motor Company, C.A. 6th (1974), 497 F.2d 1292, 1293[2],
This is a civil action seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the wrongful death of the plaintiff’s decedent from the defendant’s alleged medical malpractice. The plaintiff attempted to invoke the Court’s jurisdiction on the basis of diversity of citizenship…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Laura Hayden v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Southeastern Aviation, Inc. v. HurdTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Justice v. Ohio, Bureau of Workers' Compensation (In Re Justice)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998