Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Denham v. Shellman Grain Elevator, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 18, 1971No. 45766Published

1ConcurrenceEvans, Judge

I concur in the opinion and in the judgment of affirmance.

1. I agree to Headnote 1 because there is no merit in the assignments of error considered therein, based upon the dismissal of the motion for new trial.

The trial judge, in his final order on the motion for new trial, which, incidentally, is based on the general grounds only, stated that the motion had been several times continued and that the defendant Denham having failed to appear, either in person or through counsel, and having failed to furnish a transcript of the evidence and the proceedings "the same is, hereby dismissed and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hill v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  2. Boatright v. Rich's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Wren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Tiller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  5. Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API