Legal Opinion

Fink v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1914No. 22,310PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Prom Superior Court of Marion County (72,929); Charles J. Orbison, Judge. Action by Henry J. Pink against The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

Appellant instituted this action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of the relocation of appellee’s railroad and right of way. The facts, in substance, are thus set out in appellant’s complaint. Appellee is a duly incorporated steam railroad company, under the laws of the State of Indiana, and, prior to the year 1905, owned and operated a line of railroad which extended along the east line of certain farm lands owned by appellant and was located within about seventy feet of appellant’s residence on said farm. That by reason of the proximity of said house to said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hanlin v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Beseman v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
  3. Morgan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Carroll v. Wisconsin Central Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Roman Catholic Church of St. Anthony of Padua v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pry v. PryIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Wilmont v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Taylor v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  4. Ettinger v. RobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Hinkle v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API