Carmona v. State

I concur in the judgment of the Court.

I

THE FACTS

During cross-examination, the State sought to impeach appellant with statements made to a polygraph examiner employed by appellant’s attorney. The statements were contained in a written report prepared by the polygraph examiner. It is undisputed that appellant’s counsel provided a copy of the report to the district attorney and to the police department.1 Appellant objected, contending the admission of the statements would violate the attorney-client privilege. The trial judge overruled the objection, determined the privilege had been waived and…