Legal Opinion

United States v. O'Neill

District Court, D. Maine

Decided January 20, 2010No. CR-09-173-B-WPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON GOVERNMENT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE REGARDING DEFENDANT’S SUBJECTIVE INTENT

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief District Judge.

On October 21, 2009, a federal grand jury indicted John P. O’Neill for transmitting threatening communications in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875(c). Indictment (Docket # 17). The case is scheduled for jury selection on February 2, 2010. The Government moved in limine on December 22, 2009 to prevent Mr. O’Neill from presenting evidence of his subjective intent in transmitting the threats. Gov’t’s Mot. in Limine To Preclude Evidence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. FulmerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Paul Kent CasselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API