Legal Opinion

Austin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 9, 2011No. 1D10-2308PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarstiller, J.

Michael J. Austin (“Appellant”) appeals his conviction and probationary sentence for violating section 847.0133, Florida Statutes (2009), which makes it a third-degree felony to “knowingly sell, rent, loan, give away, distribute, transmit, or show any obscene material to a minor.”1 Citing Pope v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497, 107 S.Ct. 1918, 95 L.Ed.2d 439 (1987), Appellant asserts the trial court should have modified the jury instruction on obscenity to include a “reasonable person” standard. He also contends the court abused its discretion by proscribing alcohol consumption as a special condition…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Pope v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Biller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pulecio v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Marshall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Pulecio v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API