Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fourth Nat. Bank of Nashville v. Stahlman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1915Published

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson Connty. — Jno. Allison, Chancellor.

1Concurrence

Me. Special Justice. Caldwell

delivered a concurring opinion as follows:

*395The controlling question in this litigation at its present stage, that submitted for reargnment, is whether the bank is entitled to hold, as secnrity for a pre-exist-ing debt of E. B. Stahlman and wife, collaterals pledged by him with his personal note to the hank for borrowed money.

It'is usual for borrowers of money from banks to secure their loan notes by the pledge of collaterals; and it is allowable in law for the parties to agree at the time that the collaterals so pledged may he held also for the payment of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gillet v. . Bank of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Houston National Bank v. WoodTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hallowell v. Blackstone National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Norfleet v. Pamlico Insurance & Banking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Gibson v. BoardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API